Freelite® - Recommended for use at Diagnosis
Remove the inconvenience and ensure the best detection rate
Include Freelite® in your laboratory algorithm
International Guidelines recommend the use of Freelite®
The International Myeloma Working Group guidelines2 state that Freelite® should be used for the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of B cell dyscrasias.
| The International Myeloma Working Group guidelines2 state that Freelite® should be used for the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of B cell dyscrasias. At diagnosis "The serum FLC assay in combination with serum PEL and serum IFE is sufficient to screen for pathological monoclonal plasmaproliferative disorders other than AL, which requires all the serum tests as well as the 24-h urine IFE." The advice was based upon results obtained in extensive clinical trials using the polyclonal Freelite® assays. |
Suggested laboratory diagnosis algorithm
An algorithm combining SPE and Freelite® FLC will allow for the most sensitive and specific identification of all significant monoclonal proteins and negate the requirement for urine samples for screening for Bence Jones Protein.
A number of webinars are available with more information.
Using currently available data Table 1 shows the detection rate for all patients with Multiple Myeloma, AL amyloidosis, Light Chain Multiple Myeloma and Nonsecretory Multiple Myeloma using different combinations of diagnostic tests.3,4,5,6,7,8
It is important to note that for Light Chain Multiple Myeloma, Freelite® detected 100% of patients when compared to SPE and UPE which detected only 90%.
An optimal pick up rate for all paraproteins can be achieved by simply performing SPE or CZE plus Freelite® without the need for a urine sample.
Table 1
| Protocols | % of Paraproteins detected | |||
| *Myeloma | AL | LCMM | NSMM | |
| SPE/CZE alone | 90 | 50 | 40 - 57 | 0 |
| SPE/CZE, serum IFE | 95 | 70 | 75 | 0 |
| SPE/CZE and UPE | 95 | 75 | 90 | 0 |
| SPE/CZE, UPE serum and urine IFE | 97 | 90 | 95 | 0 |
| Freelite® alone | 96 | 98 | 100 | 68** |
|
SPE/CZE and Freelite® |
99 | 98 | 100 | 68** |
|
|
99 | 98 | 100 | 68** |
|
*Myeloma is inclusive of samples from patients identified with Intact Immunoglobulin Multiple Myeloma, Light Chain Multiple Myeloma and Nonsecretory Multiple Myeloma.
**A further 4/28 patients with suppression of one or both free light chains were identified in addition to this 68% equaling 82%.3 |
||||
The above studies used Freelite® polyclonal serum free light chain assays.
|
In the clinic:
|
In the laboratory:
|
|
Just a simple blood collection
|
No need to chase for urine samples
|
|
No need to chase for urine samples
|
No requirement for storage of large volume samples
|
|
Improve the turnaround time for a patient result9
|
No time consuming concentration of urines
|
|
Reduce testing costs10
|
Maximise workflow through automation
|
|
Use the same reliable test in screening that you use in monitoring
|
Reduce hands on time and release valuable labour resource
|
|
Fully quantitative assay
|
Assay time of less than 20 minutes
|
|
No significant pathology missed by replacing urine Bence Jones Protein9
|
Improve the turnaround time for patient result9
|
|
|
Reduce testing costs10
|
|
|
Use the same reliable test in your initial evaluation that you use in monitoring
|
- Katzmann JA, et al. Screening panels for detection of monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Chem 2009; 55:1517-1522
- Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines™) for Multiple Myeloma V.1.2011. © 2010 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved.
- Dispenzieri A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia 2009; 23:215-224
- Lachmann HJ, et al. Outcome in systemic AL amyloidosis in relation to changes in concentration of circulating free immunoglobulin light chains following chemotherapy. Br J Haematol 2003; 122:78-85
- Abraham RS, et al. Correlation of Serum Immunoglobulin Free Light Chain Quantification with Urinary Bence Jones Protein in Light Chain Myeloma. Clin Chem 2002; 48:655-657
- Bradwell AR, et al. Serum test for assessment of patients with Bence Jones myeloma. Lancet 2003; 361:489-491
- Drayson M, et al. Serum free light-chain measurements for identifying and monitoring patients with nonsecretory multiple myeloma. Blood 2001; 97:2900-2902
- Hill PG, et al. Serum Free Light Chains: An Alternative Test to Urine Bence Jones Proteins When Screening for Monoclonal Gammopathies. Clin Chem 2006; 52:1743-1748
- Katzmann JA, et al. Elimination of the Need for Urine Studies in the Screening Algorithm for Monoclonal Gammopathies by Using Serum Immunofixation and Free Light Chain Assays. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81:1575-1578
- Robson EJD, et al. Utility of serum free light chain analysis when screening for lymphoproliferative disorders. LabMedicine 2009;4:325-329 doi:10.1309/M6YUPSL3EIR7KE









Accuracy of different diagnostic approaches for monoclonal proteins
Accuracy of different diagnostic approaches for monoclonal proteins